PDA

View Full Version : Followup: on addiction to gaming


Parzival
06-23-2007, 12:58 PM
Submitted by James Lileks, Star Tribune Editor on Fri, 06/22/2007 - 10:13am.

No doubt a few parents took Randy Salas' story and waved it front of their teeenager’s face, blocking his view of the screen.

Well, can you be addicted to video gaming? I’m not a doctor, and have no experience the psychology of addiction, so feel free to ignore everything I say. But. I suspect it’s less a matter of “addiction” than the pleasures of familiarity and evasion. It’s the equivalent of a model train set in the basement. No one ever talked about HO Gauge Addiction when husbands en masse disappeared in the 50s and 60s to tinker with tiny electrified infrastructure, but let a few dozen million youths spend their off hours on quests, hitting elves in the head with a hammer for gold while the laundry piles up, and it’s an addiction. People will always get in too deep into something; it’s our nature.

If everyone who was addicted to games spent six hours in front of the TV every night, what would we call them? Right: normal.

I don’t play many games anymore, because I simply don’t have the time. But I know the allure. If I play a game more than half an hour these days, my wrists ache from decades of keyboard abuse. In college I got sucked into Space Invaders, and fed endless quarters into the machine, looking for the singular ping that lit up your brain when you nailed that last speeding pixel-splat a second before he overran your position. Then came Pac-Man and Asteroids and Donkey Kong and the rest of the 80 faves – crude graphics, bleep-boop sound, and gameplay that was always described as “addictive.” Well, in the sense that you wanted more, perhaps. But we quit when the money ran out. We always found something else to do.

Every kid has a misfit stage, unless they’re a pearly-toothed Class President type. Every kid spends some time in a fantasy world. In the 50s they worried terribly about comic books, and the effect they had on tender minds; kids were getting hooked on the gore and horror. It’s always something. The difference today: we develop names and syndromes and diagnoses, which somehow makes basic human behavior seem like a mechanism we can fine-tune back to perfection. If you play too many video games, you may be avoiding life and indulging yourself, right? Well, that sounds sounds harsh. Better, perhaps, to call it a disorder. That we can fix.

Internet addiction is the next pathology, no doubt. China has begun to face the problem already; supplicants get electric shocks and brain-secretion-balancing IV drips. That’s one way to cure it. Walking the dog is another.

ahfillerfillerohhowihatefiller

Joe Kickass
06-23-2007, 04:07 PM
I think there's a difference between watching TV for 6 hours straight, and playing 12 hours of Warcraft, losing your job or possibly destroying relationships.

It might be a closer comparison to compare it to gambling, or some other non-chemical based destructive behavior. If I a kid is playing video games every night in their free time, calling them lazy or whatever works. But if a man ignores his job and his family, shirking his responsibilities in favor of his hobby, then I think he has a problem.

I think however, it is far less common than some hysterics would have you believe. I saw some article where an 'expert' stated 40% of WoW players are addicted.

carmachu
06-23-2007, 04:39 PM
All depends on how you screw your defination of "addicted"

How the lump on the couch who doesnt do anything for 6 hours straight is any different from a WoW who plays for 6 hour straight is beyond me. If either are not living up to responsilities...whats the difference? AND if they are, who cares what they do for hours at a time when not having any?

Joe Kickass
06-23-2007, 04:54 PM
All depends on how you screw your defination of "addicted"

How the lump on the couch who doesnt do anything for 6 hours straight is any different from a WoW who plays for 6 hour straight is beyond me. If either are not living up to responsilities...whats the difference? AND if they are, who cares what they do for hours at a time when not having any?

I was comparing it to the person who plays 12 hours or more a day, and loses their job and their friends.

Stephane
06-23-2007, 05:47 PM
I was comparing it to the person who plays 12 hours or more a day, and loses their job and their friends.
..and Carmachu is comparing it to the one who can't find a job or keep a job and sits on the couch for the same amount of time. It's a choose your poison moment not really anything else.

Joe Kickass
06-23-2007, 06:39 PM
..and Carmachu is comparing it to the one who can't find a job or keep a job and sits on the couch for the same amount of time. It's a choose your poison moment not really anything else.

No, he compared it to someone who watches TV for half the time.

Parzival
06-24-2007, 12:42 AM
<shrug> There is no stimulation on-line computer games provide that is not readily-availible in hundreds of other ways.

We aren't talking about an uncontrollable disease or possessing demon.
We're talking about a controllable character flaw.

My wife would claim that I am addicted to this forum.
That in no way means I go through DTs when I'm away from computers. Or that I'm compelled to spend a dozen hours here every day.
It just means I have a habit that she doesn't like.
And if I ever *did* spend enough time here that I was failing to preform my responcibilities, it wouldn't be the fault of my "addiction". It would be my fault for choosing to shirk my responcibilities.